The Cognitive Cycle of Immersive Didactics – Immersive Didactics: Learn to Engage

Under construction!

Image by J. Balla Photography via unsplash.com

Title: The ‘Why’ of Immersion: Deconstructing the Cognitive Cycle of Immersive Education

Introduction: Understanding the Engine of Deep Learning

Title: The ‘Why’ of Immersion: Deconstructing the Cognitive Cycle of Immersive Education

Introduction: Understanding the Engine of Deep Learning

At Immersive Didactics, our goal is ambitious yet simple: to make learning deeply effective, intrinsically pleasurable, and sustainably motivating. We aim for learners to achieve a state of Immersion, where they are so fully engrossed in the learning experience that they lose track of time, absorb information deeply, and feel a genuine desire to continue their educational journey.

But why does immersion work? How does the brain transition from passive reception to active, focused engagement? And what mechanisms drive the desire to learn more? To answer these questions, we need to look beyond surface-level teaching techniques and delve into the underlying cognitive and neurological processes at play.

This article explores the Cognitive Cycle of Immersive Education, the theoretical engine that powers deep learning within the Immersive Didactics framework. This isn’t a ‘how-to’ guide (for that, see our resources on The 3-AS Model); rather, this is the foundational ‘why’. We will explore our core definitions, delve into key neuroscientific theories of consciousness and cognition, and synthesize them to reveal the self-reinforcing cycle that makes immersive learning so powerful.

Defining Our Terms: Immersion and Learning

Before we dive into the mechanisms, let’s clarify our key concepts:

Immersion: We define Immersion as: “Immersion is a cognitive state in which the learner allocates seemingly all their cognitive resources towards the learning experience, fully engrossing themselves in the learning experience and losing track of time.” This state is intuitively recognizable – the feeling of being ‘lost’ in a book, a complex task, or a compelling game. It’s a state of deep focus and engagement that, as research shows, correlates strongly with enhanced learning outcomes and positive subjective experience.

—————————————————————————————————————–

Have you ever been so engrossed in learning something – reading a fascinating book, tackling a challenging problem, mastering a new skill – that time just seemed to melt away? You look up hours later, feeling not drained, but energized and satisfied? That deep state of focus and absorption is what we at Immersive Didactics call Immersion. Our definition of Immersion is as follows:

“Immersion is a cognitive state in which the learner allocates seemingly all their cognitive resources towards the learning experience, fully engrossing themselves in the learning experience and losing track of time.”

We believe that fostering this state is key to make learning not only more effective (leading to better understanding and retention) but also more intrinsically rewarding and enjoyable for both learners and educators. What’s more, we posit that this belief is supported by credible scientific evidence and practical experience across disciplines such as educational science, cognitive neuroscience, entertainment and psychology.

In order for us to understand why this cognitive state of Immersion is beneficial to learning , we must first explore what learning is and how it comes about.

“

Only then can we make informed claims about how we should seek to shape said learning. To that end, we need to answer a few questions, like: What’s learning? How does learning work? To that end, we’ve taken a fairly brain-centric to learning at Immersive Didactics. approach

But how does this highly desirable state come about?

The answer lies in understanding the underlying process we call the Cognitive Cycle of Immersive Education. This cycle isn’t just a theory; it’s the core engine driving deep, meaningful, and motivating learning. This article introduces you to this fundamental concept, the heartbeat of the Immersive Didactics approach.

What is the Cognitive Cycle of Immersive Education?

Think of the Cognitive Cycle as a powerful, self-reinforcing feedback loop operating within the learner’s mind. It describes the journey from initial interest to deep immersion and the motivation to continue learning. Here’s how it unfolds:

Engagement: It all starts here. Something needs to capture the learner’s attention and pull them into the learning experience. This is the initial spark, driven by well-chosen sensory or cognitive stimuli relevant to the learning goal. (Engagement is that which pulls a learner into the learning experience.)
Sustained Over Time: A fleeting moment of interest isn’t enough. Engagement needs to be held consistently over a period. The learning experience must provide ongoing reasons for the learner to keep their cognitive resources focused on the task at hand.
Immersion: When sufficient engagement is sustained over sufficient time, the magic happens. The learner enters a state of Immersion – they become fully absorbed, allocating seemingly all their cognitive resources to the experience, often losing track of time and external distractions. (Immersion is a cognitive state in which the learner allocates seemingly all their cognitive resources towards the learning experience, fully engrossing themselves… and losing track of time.)

he Cognitive Cycle of Immersive Didactics is a theoretical model that ’ties together’ the Three Acts within The 3-AS Model for Immersive Didactics. In a nutshell, The Cognitive Cycle of Immersive Education proposes a theoretical feedback loop that educators can apply to; (1) ‘hook’ learners into a learning experience, (2) create a subjectively pleasurable and effective learning experience, that (3) makes the learner want to re-engage with the learning experience at a later time.

To that end, we wished to create a simple cyclical model that is intuitive and can be flexibly put into practice. The cognitive cycle of Immersive Didactics via The 3-AS model for Immersive Didactics on a wide range of educational contexts.

Indeed, we believe this model can be effectively used to design and redesign education from the level of curricula all the way down to individual lessons, learning activities and even individual student-teacher interactions and mentoring talks.¹ Similarly to The Cognitive Cycle of Immersive Education that underpins the 3 Acts of the 3AS model for Immersive Didactics, the 3 Stages of Immersive Didactics are underpinned by Teaching as a Performance Art, which is a theoretical model that seeks to adress many problems teachers nowadays experience with their practice such as burnout and leaving the profession early.

At Immersive Didactics, we take a fairly brain-centric approach to our understanding of consciousness, cognition and learning. We want educators to understand learning as a physical phenomenon grounded in observable reality that can be measured and reproduced through scientific inquiry and practice. In this way, we wish to demystify learning by focusing on the neurological processes involved. This isn’t to dismiss other valuable perspectives (like social or philosophical ones), but rather to provide a specific lens that helps us understand how engagement and immersion physically occur in the brain, allowing us to design more effective learning experiences based on those mechanisms. Sometimes, educational approaches prioritize goals other than optimizing the learning process itself (like focusing heavily on specific collaboration formats for social reasons, even if other methods might yield better learning for that specific task). Our brain-centric approach aims to keep the focus squarely on optimizing the neurological processes that constitute learning, believing this provides a powerful foundation for educational design.

To understand our brain-centric approach to education, we should start with our definition of learning. This is:

“Learning is the act of acquiring and strengthening neurological patterns that can be applied at a later time.”

Then, we must understand ‘how learning works’ at the level of conscious experience. How does information get processed? To that end, we wish to introduce you to core ideas from two influential theories about consciousness: Global Workspace Theory (GWT) and Integrated Information Theory (IIT).

//Explain the hard and soft problem of consciousness//

Understanding how we become aware and experience things like learning is one of the biggest questions in science. To break it down, thinkers often talk about two kinds of problems:

The “Soft” Problems: These deal with the functions of the brain related to consciousness. How does the brain focus attention? How does it access memories? How does it tell the difference between being awake and asleep? How does it process information from our senses? Scientists can study these using experiments and brain imaging – they look at the brain’s mechanics. When we talk about learning mechanisms, we’re often tackling these “soft” problems. * The “Hard” Problem: This is the deeper mystery, famously framed by philosopher David Chalmers.² It asks: Why does all that brain processing feel like anything from the inside? Why do we have subjective experiences – the redness of red, the feeling of joy, or what it’s like to be completely absorbed in reading a book? It’s about the quality of experience itself, not just the function.

Why this matters for Immersive Didactics: While we primarily focus on the “soft problem” side – designing learning experiences that optimize brain functions like attention and information processing – acknowledging the “hard problem” reminds us that the subjective feeling of being engaged and immersed is incredibly important. We aim to create experiences that not only work well mechanically but also feel compelling and positive for the learner, even if science can’t yet fully explain the ‘why’ of that feeling.

//Introduce the stage play concept and integrate it with IIT.//

The Theater of Your Mind (Global Workspace Theory – GWT):

A helpful way to think about consciousness comes from Global Workspace Theory. Imagine your mind as a theater:

Backstage: This is where most of the work happens unconsciously – stored memories, automatic skills, processing sensory input without you noticing. Think of the stage crew, lighting technicians, actors waiting for their cue.

The Stage: This is your conscious awareness – the limited space where information becomes ‘live’. Only a few actors or pieces of information can be on stage at any given moment.

The Spotlight: This is your attention. It selects what information gets to move from the backstage darkness onto the brightly lit stage.

The Broadcast: Once information is ‘on stage’, it’s broadcast widely to the entire ‘audience’ – the vast network of unconscious processes backstage. This allows different parts of your brain to access and work with the information you’re currently aware of.

What does this mean for learning? Effective learning often involves getting the right information onto the conscious stage via the spotlight of attention, and keeping it there long enough to be broadcast and processed deeply by the relevant backstage areas.

Adding Richness (Integrated Information Theory – IIT):

Now, IIT adds another layer. It suggests that consciousness isn’t just about what’s on stage, but about how richly connected and integrated the information is.

Think of the difference between a single actor mumbling one line (low integration) versus a full scene with multiple actors interacting, complex lighting, music, and props, all working together to create a unified meaning (high integration).

IIT proposes that the degree of integrated information is related to the level of consciousness. More complex, interconnected patterns of information mean a richer conscious experience.

What does this mean for Immersion? When you’re immersed in learning, your mental ‘stage’ isn’t just occupied; it’s filled with highly interconnected information related to the task. Distractions are pushed aside (less competing information), and your brain weaves together sensory details, concepts, memories, and skills into a coherent whole.³ This state of high information integration aligns with the principles of IIT and likely represents a powerful state for forming and strengthening those neurological learning patterns.

Now, let’s take a look at this, and add in a layer of understanding from modern neuroscience, that is, the measurement of how the brain actually functions and releases chemicals related to emotions and thoughts.

//Introduce neurochemicals and their relationship to learner//

Our brain-centric view also considers brain chemistry. Tiny messenger molecules called neurochemicals (like neurotransmitters and hormones) constantly influence how we feel, what grabs our attention, and how well we remember things.⁴ Think of them as tuning knobs for our mental state:

* Dopamine (The “Motivation/Reward” Messenger): Released when we anticipate or achieve something rewarding – solving a puzzle, understanding a concept, getting positive feedback.⁵ It makes us feel good and drives us to repeat the actions that led to the reward. Crucial for building the desire to learn more.

Endorphins (The “Well-being/Resilience” Messengers): Natural mood lifters and pain relievers. Can be released during engaging challenges, contributing to a feeling of satisfaction or even exhilaration after overcoming difficulty. Helps make effort feel worthwhile.

Oxytocin (The “Connection/Trust” Messenger): Associated with social bonding and feeling safe. Positive interactions with teachers and peers can release oxytocin, making the learning environment feel supportive and reducing anxiety, which frees up cognitive resources for learning.⁶ * Serotonin (The “Mood/Calmness” Messenger): Involved in regulating mood, feelings of calm, and overall well-being.⁷ A positive, predictable learning environment helps maintain healthy serotonin activity, supporting focus and reducing stress.

(Important Note): The brain’s chemistry is complex, but knowing about these key players helps us understand why certain educational strategies work. Making learning rewarding, appropriately challenging, socially supportive, and emotionally positive taps directly into these neurological systems that drive motivation and memory.

//Tie it all together using the stage play metaphor, neurochemicals and how these pleasurable hormones pull someone (back) into the learning experience.//

So, how do the ‘mental stage’ and brain chemistry work together to create the Cycle of Immersive Education?

Getting Hooked (Engagement Focuses the Spotlight): When a learning experience is well-designed (using ‘Promises’ and engaging ‘Progress’ from the 3-AS model), it captures the learner’s spotlight of attention, bringing relevant information onto the conscious stage (GWT). Distractions are minimized.

Deepening Involvement (Integration on Stage): As engagement is sustained, the information on stage becomes more richly integrated (IIT). The learner isn’t just receiving facts; they’re connecting ideas, applying skills, and making sense of the material in a coherent way.

The ‘Aha!’ and ‘Feel-Good’ Moments (Neurochemical Rewards): Successfully meeting challenges, making breakthroughs, or simply enjoying the process triggers the release of rewarding neurochemicals like dopamine and endorphins.⁸ The feeling of safety and connection might add oxytocin and serotonin. This creates a positive subjective experience – the learning feels good.

Closing the Loop (Pleasure Drives Re-engagement): This positive feeling, driven by neurochemicals, acts as reinforcement. The brain learns: “This activity is rewarding!” Dopamine, in particular, fuels the motivation to seek out that rewarding state again.⁹ The learner is intrinsically more likely to direct their ‘spotlight’ back to this topic or activity later, wanting to re-experience that state of focused, satisfying immersion. This desire for re-engagement completes the cycle, making learning a self-reinforcing process.

//Introduce Immersion//

This peak state of focused, satisfying, and often effortless-feeling engagement is what we call Immersion. We define it as:

(Optional addition from 3-AS text for richness): It often involves balancing challenge and skill, experiencing curiosity and joy, and developing an eagerness to return for more learning.

Now that we reviewed the basis of the model, we can spell it all out into a simple cyclical model we call The Cycle of Immersive Education. This is the underlying theoretical model that underpins our ’three acts of immersive didactics’ in the 3-AS Model. (Here you could insert a visual diagram of the cycle and/or reiterate the Engagement -> Time -> Immersion -> Pleasure -> Re-engagement loop formula explicitly).